Yikes!
Sustainable citizenry in action


The Yikes! 2001 Archives



  • 1-05. Melbourne's first Car Free Day
  • 30-04. Car-Free Living in Europe (mainly)
  • 29-04. All Aboard report, UK Audit Commission
  • 28-04. Tell the Bush Administration to Stop Global Warming Now!
  • 27-04. Two-Stroke Engine Ban Campaign in Dhaka (ECFD Profile)
  • 26/04. Visit Go for Green (Health & environment, Canada)
  • 24/04. More World Traffic in View
  • 22-04. ICTA Campaign on Auto Pollution (ECFD Profile)
  • 22-04. View latest edition of CarFree Times
  • 20-04.Roadkill Bill in Illichville
  • 19-04. The First-Ever Earth Car Free Day
  • 18-04. Message from Perth: Adaptive behavior under duress as a clue (ECFD Profile)
  • 17-04. Be proud, say it loud with the All-New Godzilla SUV
  • 16/04. ECFD's Do-it-Yourself Virtual Petition Machine
  • 15/04. Get ready to pay full price for that nice car of yours!
  • 13-14/04. World Traffic in 24 Virtual Variations
  • 11-12/04. I think ECFD is a poor idea because. . .
  • 10/04. Car Free in Portugal (requires Shockwave)
  • 9/04. "No-Car Day" Greeting from Malaysia (requires Shockwave)
  • 8/04. Dawn of a New Species? (important scientific discovery)
  • 7/04. City Lights (urban sprawl impacts illustrate the problem)
  • 6/04. The Disposable Car (Relayed direct from MIT)
  • 4/04. The New Colonist: Special Issue on CarFree Cities
  • 3/04. Adolf Hitler did not carshare (large pdf file)
  • 2/04. The New Colonist: Special Issue on CarFree Cities
  • 1/04. Nashville Native proposes Car-Full Day Challenge
  • 31/03. Angerman on Kyoto and the American Way of Life
  • 30/03. A World without cars, ENN article on ECFD 2001
  • 29/03. "Auto Logic", a poem
  • 28/03. One Giant Step Backward
  • 25/03. When the sun goes down on Tonga
  • 24/03. Message from Fremantle
  • 23/03. "Don Corleone of Carsharing"
  • 22/03. "What you always wanted to know about Bogota but..."
  • 21/03. "The Daughters of Jane"
  • 20/03. "The Long Winding Road to ECFD"
  • 19 March, "Someone say Global Warming?"




  • Grist Magazine Series:
    Week 12 Diary



  • And to be fair check out:
    The Other Side

  • Yikes!, a free paperless journal, invites our international collaborators to join in sharing background information, challenges and thinkpieces which offer different perspective on the "pattern break" approach to laying the base for more sustainable transportation systems, including "car free" and "less car" projects and approaches of a huge range of types and variations.
    I would like to read Yikes! in a "quick translation" version of . . .
    * Chinese     * French     * Italian     * German     * Japanese     * Spanish

    Yikes! 2 May 2001.
    The Commons, Paris.

  • Is Making Transportation Sustainable Easy?
    A cautionary tale from Delhi

    On April 3rd, there was a riot in Delhi that had at its start the best of intentions: making the city's transpiration cleaner and more sustainable. What went wrong? Is this the tale of just one city? The following two articles help us understand better what is really going on.

    Part I. New paper coverage of incident
    Straits Times Interactive, Apr 04, 2001

    New Delhi commuters torch buses as crisis hits transport

    The anger erupts after a court orders thousands of smoky vehicles off the roads in a bid to clean up the city's air, leading to a shortage of buses

    By Nirmal Ghosh, India Correspondent

    NEW DELHI - The Indian capital was plunged into chaos yesterday as furious commuters torched buses to protest against a lack of public transport after a court order forced thousands of smoky vehicles off the roads.

    Tens of thousands of commuters were stranded and blocked the streets, trying in desperation to hitch rides in private cars or on motor scooters.

    A crowd of 2,000 burnt six public buses and broke the windows of 10 more on the outskirts of New Delhi, expressing their anger and frustration after waiting for hours.

    The crisis is expected to last all week - but hard-hit schools and businesses will get some respite tomorrow and Friday, which are public holidays.

    Some schools closed for the week yesterday.

    The few buses plying the streets were mobbed, with commuters sitting on rooftops and clinging to the window grilles at the back.

    Only about 2,000 buses were on the streets yesterday - down from the usual 12,500.

    At the heart of the problem is an effort to clean up the capital's environment after decades of neglect and galloping growth.

    The city, with a population of close to 14 million, has become the most densely populated in the country.

    In 1998, the Supreme Court ordered all Delhi-registered commercial vehicles to convert to compressed natural gas (CNG), instead of diesel and petrol.

    After several extensions, the final deadline fell last Sunday.

    Owners of transport vehicles waited as long as possible to convert, hoping they would not have to, because the conversion can cost up to 7,000 rupees (S$280) per vehicle, although the CNG is said to be less expensive in the long run.

    As Monday was a public holiday, the full scale of the chaos only surfaced yesterday.

    Officials had assured the public that at least 5,000 buses would be on the road by Monday and more yesterday.

    In the event only about 1,100 reached the streets on Monday, about 2,000 yesterday and, by the end of the week, only 5,000 are expected to be in use.

    The Supreme Court ruled last week that those bus operators who had applied for CNG conversion and made down payments could take to the streets - but with special permits.

    But it takes hours to issue a permit.

    The Times of India said in an editorial yesterday: 'Who is behind the mess? It's a bunch of politicians who uncaringly allowed deadline after court deadline to pass. They did so obviously presuming politicians are accountable to none.'


    I have a comment to make on this article!

    The CNG conversion drive is part of an effort on several fronts to address the problem of New Delhi's pollution, much of which is caused by car emissions, especially from diesel and from old-technology two-stroke auto-rickshaw engines.

    Copyright © 2001 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Forwarded for the purposes of education and research under the fair play provisions of copyright law.

    * * *

    Back to top

    Part II. Independant Commentary

  • Gas distress
  • WHILE all those orders of the Supreme Court (SC) directed towards the corporate sector - public or private - have largely resulted in action, orders to the government - state or central - have usually resulted in total chaos. In April 1999, when the SC gave the auto industry just about two months to move its engines to Euro I and about 11 months to move to Euro II, the industry met the deadlines. Similarly, the petroleum industry has repeatedly improved petrol and diesel quality as per SC orders. The little improvement that we already see in air quality in Delhi is partly because of this. In 1998, diesel contained as much as 10,000 parts per million (ppm) of sulphur but today it is down to 500 ppm. The key problem is that both the state and Central government had no political will to implement the SC order on CNG.

    Dealing with the order, made 31 months ago, was quite an easy task if only a few key steps were taken. Firstly, as the matter involves the Delhi government and the Petroleum, Surface Transport and Environment ministries of the Central government, a coordination committee should have been set up to ensure smooth implementation. Both Sheila Dikshit, chief minister of the Delhi, and prime minister Atal Behari Vajpayee should have worked together to ensure that such a mechanism was established. But each agency worked out of sync with the other.

    Secondly, as the management of the process of conversion required technical competence on auto emissions, technology and health effects and as generalist bureaucrats have no understanding of these matters, a technical team should have been put in place to advise the government. In the absence of this advice, the Delhi government has remained consistently confused and has allowed every vested interest to take it for a ride. Both Lt Governor Vijai Kapoor and transport minister Pervez Hashmi have repeatedly made statements questioning the viability of CNG on the basis of some paper or the other sent to them by various interest groups including anonymous sources. If such expertise was not available within India, the Delhi government could have even obtained the services of some foreign experts - just as it commissioned a British consultant to prepare a study on industrial relocation with foreign aid. Even environment minister T R Baalu could have set up such a technical committee but did nothing of the sort. As a result, there has been confusion galore. Delhi government's positions have been exactly the same as those of auto majors who do not wish to see a changeover to CNG. While Hashmi and Dikshit have repeatedly harped on CNG technology being experimental in their public statements. On the other hand, on the day Sheila Dikshit was in court, the government lawyer accepted that CNG technology is not experimental and the government was committed to the task.

    Delhi government's confusion gave a clear signal that it was not serious about the Court's order. Allowing thousands of diesel buses to come on to the roads even weeks before the Supreme Court deadline shows that the government never wanted to implement the order and fervently hoped that the threat of a crisis, which it did everything in its ability to precipitate, would force the Court to back down. Unfortunately, for the Delhi government, the Court did not.

    The third critical issue was finance. It was clear from the start that this transformation would need investments to be made by very small bus, taxi and auto operators. Three steps could have been taken to help these operators. Firstly, every effort should have been made to bring in as many manufacturers and conversion agents in India and abroad so that there was effective competition. But no advertisement was taken out in international newspapers and rules were set in a way that companies could not follow easily, thus ensuring that many companies could not participate. The result is market monopoly and high prices.

    Hashmi keeps harping that such a big effort to convert to CNG has not been made elsewhere. But he did not try to turn this to the city's advantage. The government could have easily pooled all the orders of the Delhi Transport Corporation and private transporters and then made the companies compete thus ensuring quality and low cost. But by letting the one-two bus and auto operators negotiate separately with the companies, Hashmi left them to the mercy of the wolves in the market. Not surprisingly, there have even been public allegations that this was deliberately manipulated for pecuniary reasons. A few years ago, several European city authorities, across different countries, pooled their orders to buy zero-emission buses for use in historic city centres to avoid pollution and got a big discount. If cities across nations can pool their order why couldn't we do it in one city? Poor transport operators could have been helped even further. Though Delhi is the richest state of India, it has a diesel price lower than other metros. An additional sales tax of Re 1 in 1999 and 2000 would have fetched about Rs. 300 crore. This sum is so large that the government could have even given away some 3,000 retrofitted buses free. It is clear that neither the Delhi government nor the Central government had any respect for the court order nor any desire to implement it.

    The government had no respect for the Supreme Court's order or the desire to implement it

    - Anil Agarwal

    *************************************************

    This article is also available online at http://www.cseindia.org/html/dte/dte20010430/dte_edit.htm. Visit the CSE website at www.cseindia.org and check out what's new. The website carries their science and environment fortnightly Down To Earth, a daily environment news flash by subject categories, a catalog of books and publications that are available, and all of our recent press releases.

    Back to top

    What is this?

    The pieces posted here are intended for the media, and above all for those who come to this site in support of their ideas or programs. These materials may be used freely unless otherwise indicated. We ask only that you provide the usual full and proper acknowledgement of your source:

    You will need Adobe Acrobat in order to read these PDF files. The Acrobat Reader is freely available here.

    Back to top

    The Other Side
    Not everybody likes car free days. Not everybody equally loves public interest or ecology action groups. And not everybody likes it when anybody or anything tries to get between them and their cars. Like it or not, we have to be prepared to listen to these views as well. They after all have to become part of the solution, not of the problem.

    The Other Side is our open tribunal for those who wish to make their points of view heard too. Have anything good that you can share with us that expresses these concerns and positions? This is the place to share it with us.

    And from you?
    Have you comments, corrections or suggestions on any of the Today pieces given here. Suggestions for additional topics? An idea for a joint article or one that you would like to prepare yourself? Other media ideas? A cartoon? A song? A play? An web opera? This is the place to let us know. Diversity rules!

    Back to top

    ECFD-Postmaster@ecoplan.org


    Last updated 26 April 2001. © 1994-2001 EcoPlan , Paris.
    Best viewed with Internet Explorer 4.0 or better.
    Site Map    What's New    Search