| Discussion, Comments, Feedback
Kyoto Cities New Mobility Discussions Journals/Newsletters To get in touch: |
The menu to your left provides links to a handful of international discussion groups which serve specific interest groups exchanging ideas and information in areas closely related to the concerns of this program. The top set are specific to the Kyoto Cities Challenge, while the rest are of a more general nature. You may wish to check into these and eventually participate as your time and taste allow.
This private forum has been created to provide a handy communications pipeline and message storage facility in support of the emerging Kyoto Cities working groups/clusters. This is where we get together to brainstorm and exchange ideas and views on our topic. While participation is by invitation only, the list is lightly moderated just to make sure that the exchanges are indeed in line with our time-pressed colleagues' interests.
An informal, partial, ad hoc collection of some of the most interesting and challenging news, communications, excerpts and working notes generated via projects and exchanges taking place here. Critical discussions of 20/20 welcomed, as are proposals for alternative approaches to compliance.
You are invited to share your comments and views on any points, pieces or articles posted here that strike your interest. And to submit your own items. Click here to go to the Kyoto Cities Blog. And here for hints on how to post your own comments and contributions.
A Wiki or wiki is a web application that allows users to add content, as on an Internet forum, but also allows anyone to edit the content. The name was based on the Hawaiian term wiki wiki, meaning "quick" or "super-fast". What you can click to and use here is a page from the Global Villages Wiki, an investigatorium of the Minciu Sodas Laboratory Network.
This is a wide open disucussion as you will see. To use the wiki to make your entries click the WikiHelp link at the base of the page.
10 March 2005:
In this new section we shall be transcribing here on a selection of the comments and observations that come in and which we feel will be of particular interest to the group.
We also suggest that you occasoinally have a look at the dedicated discussion groups listed to your left here, in which suggestions and comments are also being made on the program.
-----Original Message----- . . . I like the grouping you are shaping, although the test is what actually happens as a result. I guess it's like a big jigsaw where each of us has at least one piece to bring, and some of the experienced experts already have quite a few pieces already assembled and proven. Do we know the picture, or are we working blind ? Either way, working together helps to solve the puzzle. To extend the analogy, isn't the sky always the hardest bit of the jigsaw ?
As usual, I'm working on quite a few areas, including regulatory frameworks for urban transport, and intelligent systems for public transport. However, the area which might have the most to contribute to your work is demand-responsive transport (DRT). Until very recently, this has been more or less ignored as minibuses for the elderly and the villages, where nothing else would work. Recent advances with ITS, organisational approaches and business models are changing that.
But what happens if we bring true demand responsive transport into cities at a serious level? European and North American transportation planners can't really think it through because they're not familiar with large scale collective transit based on small to medium sized vehicles. By contrast, cities in Russia, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Brazil and many other countries are familiar with it. For example, even in St. Petersburg the route-taxis have 14% of the public transport market share, slightly less than the tram and more than the trolleybus. Of course, in those countries the quality is often poor, and there are frequently criminal elements involved.
But that's not the point. If these resources can be mobilised in a better way in places like Russia and China, and if these forms of transport can be introduced to North American and European cities, then we have an additional mode that can go head-to-head with the car for the car passenger market and the second-car market. The key is knowing where and when people want to travel, and matching the mobility resources with the demand at affordable prices. To be very clear, these are seen as complementary to the larger forms of public transport, not as replacements.
To come back to the jigsaw analogy, DRT is a piece. It has better value when it's linked to other pieces, and of course has best value when it's in the right place.
With best wishes, Brendan.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Le Frene, 8/10 rue Joseph Bara 75006 Paris, France, Europe. T: +331 4326 1323 Copyright © 1994-2005 The Commons ® All rights reserved. Last updated on 11 May 2005 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||