|
Quick Background Section
Although the Bogota Referendum is without any doubt the most important attempt of its type to nail down a car free policy through a popular referendum to date, it is not without precedent. Here is some quick information on two somewhat similar earlier efforts.
In March of 1992 a referendum in Amsterdam called on the city government to halve automobile traffic and parking spaces in the center of the city by the year 2002. It also provided for auto-free streets, bike lanes, enlarged pedestrian walks, an 18-mph automobile speed limit, and a number of other complimentary measures. The plan won the support of 53% of voters.
And while the path since has been anything but straight forward, the fact is that if you go into the historic center of Amsterdam today you will see that enough has happened in the interim, one way or another, so that about the worst way to get around there is in your private car. (Some additional background on the Amsterdam experience is available here. And if anyone wishes to help us complete and update this profile, well, we are waiting for you.)
In this first attempt in Switzerland 21% of those going to the polls voted for this initiative. Before you write that off as a failure, please consider that it meant that some 400,000 thoughtful, highly conservative Swiss voted for this measure. Bearing in mind that it was carried out by a small unbudgeted cooperative group, this has to be be considered a considerable accomplishment under the circumstances. The sponsors of the initiative are continuing to work on their program and intend to take this to the voters again.
Paris, 26 October 2000
Dear Colleagues,
On Sunday, the 29th of October, two questions are being submitted to the citizens that comprise the electoral census of Bogotá, covering issues which in my view are critical to the future well-being of the city and its inhabitants. The first of these asks for citizen views and support concerning institutionalization of the annual Car Free Day, in the wake of this year's highly successful venture which many of you were so kind as to publicly support earlier this year. The second, much more daring, asks for their support for a proposal to ban ALL private car traffic in the city in peak hours beginning in the year 2015.
The full Spanish language version of the popular proposal can be found on the Web at http://www.terra.com.co/proyectos/bogotasincarros/, together with additional background material and a spot poll of visitor views.
A number of other sites also are reporting on this, including:
In this terribly tight time frame, here is what we are asking of you. First and if you agree, will you provide a public indication of your support of this important sustainability initiative? This would ideally take the form of a short email with a few lines of comments, rounded out by your name, title, etc., with as much immodesty and effusion as these unusual circumstances merit. This letter of support should be addressed to Bogotá City Hall at consnacion@gaitana.interred.net.co, and copied to us here at Referendum@ecoplan.org. Our friends in Bogotá will then make industrious use of these support letters over the next three days to show all those concerned that this is not simply an isolated local initiative of perhaps dubious merit, but a central issue and opportunity for this embattled city to make a contribution in the world sustainability arena. For our part we shall be working hard from here to support them in this.
Second and last, they also are looking for volunteers to discuss these matters with the local media. They have already carried out radio interviews with several of our colleagues, and of course for this one does need to be comfortable working in Spanish.
There you have it. One more example of thinking (and collaborating) globally, while acting locally. If this note catches you in time, I am sure that you are going to want to join us in supporting this citizen initiative at 2600 meters and ever so many kilometers away, in this embattled Third World city that is trying not only to deal with its own crushing problems of environment, life quality and social justice, but also, if we think about, to lead the way for us all.
Updated 27 October 2000 |